In The Spirit Of Unity...
I have wondered, reading through blogs and such on OC...what is more beneficial to us, unity, or fallowing the Orthodox faith, reguardless of if people break away from us, or if the heretics never come back to the Church?
For all intents and purposes, I\'m finding that the more neutral, loose side...which is keyed on the ecumenical movement...seems more prevalent here. This bothers me, since we\'re all supposed to be lovers of truth, not of image.
Who here, in their heart, would rather see a million \"happy\" posts to which they agree, over one or two posts that, though they may not agree with at the time, see the truth in them, and actually \"think\" about the post...then come to a much more clear understanding of where they themselves stand in their faith, and if they need to change their views a little to be more in line with what The Fathers have taught from generations past?
Sadly, by the looks of it, the first is among the greater on this site, OC. I have hopes that I will see some benefit unto God occur with my membership here, but it wont happen all on my own, I know that.
I don\'t know...just disturbed by a trend I\'m seeing in posts and blogs...as well as polls lately.
What do you think?
Be the first person to like this.
#2
Is it possible, Jimmy The Rock, other
Orthodox Christians, or whoever will
respond to this ... is it possible for there to
be a \"false unity\", mere outward unity,
organizational, where knowledge of
Christian Truth is absent ... where there is
truths (good doctrines) mixed with some
errors, such as FIlioque, purgatory,
immaculate conception of Virgin Mary, etc.
What of the case of Mrs. Vassula Ryden?
Who is she? Is she Greek Orthodox? She
seems to be wanting to make very many
concessions to Roman Catholicism in the
name of Unity with Rome for the Greek
Orthodox ... is this a compromising unity,
that does not respect not only Orthodox
rights and freedom in Christ, but also
Orthodox Truth and Gospel unity .... unity
in the True Faith, the True Light ... I don\'t
know: I haven\'t come into the True Faith,
not yet at least .... but this lady obviously
seems to want to please Roman Catholicism,
but what price must be paid .... for
outward unity with papal Rome, which has
not recanted Filioque, or Vatican I, etc.
See: If interested ...
\"True Life in God \"A publication for the
American Association for True Life in God,
No. 31, November, 2007
www.tlig.org
The American Association for True Life in
God
P.O. Box 413
East Amherst, NY 14051
aatlig@gmail.com
Cf. Cavarnos, Constantine. Against False
Union. Etna, CA: Center For Traditionalist
Orthodox Studies, 2006.
GOD SAVE US.
ALWAYS,
Scott Harrington
Pennsylvania USA
Be the first person to like this.
JustinMiller wrote:
I don't think you can get in trouble for sharing an opinion with someone. Public blogs are fair game for public commentary. I suppose you could get into trouble for "harrassment" if you commented or criticized upon private blogs, etc. What exactly are you worried about, Jimmy?
All the blogs and bulletins I\'ve posted, which have not been directed at anyone or any group out here, have brought the moderating staff \"to my door\" as it were, and they\'ve either erased my public posts themselves, or have asked me to set them as private.
I feel kind of descriminated against, and I\'d hate to say it, but it seems it\'s \"because\" I am part of HOCNA.
Now mind you, some of the moderators seem to be friendly enough, and have a spirit of brotherly love, and have, according to what they have told me, been on my side, thus I have not been deleted from this site yet.
But I\'m starting to get the attitude of \"Come on...REEAALY??...WHAT \"CAN\" I post then?
You, Brother, have seen what I\'ve posted before, heck, the last thing they deleted on their own, you were participating in! And I didn\'t think that the conversation that that item was bringing forth was hostile or of ill faith...do you? But the mod staff decided that they felt it wasn\'t a topic to have in public view, and they deleted it.
That poll was harmless, as far as I could tell. ::shrugs::
But I feel like the \"rules\" on this site are possibly vague enough where they can point to a clause and say \"this\" is not in line with \"this\" section for such and such an implication, etc.
But, lest I get deleted for sounding like I\'m rallying a cry against the moderators here, I shall end my note in response to your question of what I\'m afraid of here. Seems like, whatever I\'ve done, has ended up \"steping on someone\'s toes\"...so, for public sight, my answer ends here...
God Bless, Dear Brother
Be the first person to like this.
Scotland1960 wrote:
Is it possible, Jimmy The Rock, other
Orthodox Christians, or whoever will
respond to this ... is it possible for there to
be a "false unity", mere outward unity,
organizational, where knowledge of
Christian Truth is absent ... where there is
truths (good doctrines) mixed with some
errors, such as FIlioque, purgatory,
immaculate conception of Virgin Mary, etc.
What of the case of Mrs. Vassula Ryden?
Who is she? Is she Greek Orthodox? She
seems to be wanting to make very many
concessions to Roman Catholicism in the
name of Unity with Rome for the Greek
Orthodox ... is this a compromising unity,
that does not respect not only Orthodox
rights and freedom in Christ, but also
Orthodox Truth and Gospel unity .... unity
in the True Faith, the True Light ... I don't
know: I haven't come into the True Faith,
not yet at least .... but this lady obviously
seems to want to please Roman Catholicism,
but what price must be paid .... for
outward unity with papal Rome, which has
not recanted Filioque, or Vatican I, etc.
See: If interested ...
"True Life in God "A publication for the
American Association for True Life in God,
No. 31, November, 2007
www.tlig.org
The American Association for True Life in
God
P.O. Box 413
East Amherst, NY 14051
aatlig@gmail.com
Cf. Cavarnos, Constantine. Against False
Union. Etna, CA: Center For Traditionalist
Orthodox Studies, 2006.
GOD SAVE US.
ALWAYS,
Scott Harrington
Pennsylvania USA
It is QUITE possible, dear brother. And that is the union I pray The Church never enters into. It\'s that \"false union\" that is poison for the soul.
It is that \"false union\" that errodes the truth, and makes us all heretics.
It is that \"false union\" that is what ecumenism strives for, though they do not see it for that at all.
Sad, Dear Brother, when the world we live in has gone so mad for unity, that we are willing to lose our own souls for it.
\"What profiteth a man if he gains the whole world...yet loses his soul...\" (paraphrased from The Bible, where Our Lord said so Himself.)
Indeed, what profit is it if we ALL unite, west and east, and call eachother equal \"sharers in salvation\"...yet lose the grace of God, and bring condemnation upon ourselves for our apostacy?
We must be carefull, and keep our eyes on our faith, and guard it as \"The Pearl Of Great Price\"...as it truly is. As the fathers taught, so we should hold fast to that which we have been given, and not change it, or leave any part of it, for the sake of a union that would deprive us of the grace only found in Orthodoxy.
In addition to My Brother\'s suggested references, I also suggest the work \"Against False Union\" as well as \"The Strugle Against Ecumenism\" (a history of \"Ecumenism\" and the results it\'s had on many Orthodox nations). Both works are published by St. Nectarios Press, 10300 Ashworth Ave. N.
Seattle, WA 98133-9410
Telephone: (206) 522-4471; Fax: (206) 523-0550
In U.S. and Canada:
1-800-643-4233
You can find them on the web by fallowing the links on: http://www.hocna.net/st_annas/
God Bless
Be the first person to like this.
#4
Dear friends, It seems the unity we seek is
threefold:
1. Unity of repentance heterodox: coming
into Orthodoxy ... repentance is not an
easy road, but it is a road, not merely a one-
timed accomplished event ... we (I) need
Christ every step of leaving my errors (and
my sins) behind; it is not merely a matter of
leaving false doctrines behind, but moral
renewal ... and confession to God (and
priest when possible) after I have sinned
(serious sins) .... So, for example, ISTM,
LCA/ELCA, LCMS, other Lutherans coming
into Orthodoxy former AG (Assembly of
God) and (E)LCA Lutherans, like me ... my
road lead from LCA to ELCA to AG back to
ELCA and along the way, a few trips to
Presbyterian and Methodist churches,
though I never became a Methodist ... for a
while, I wanted to become a
Pentecostal ... I also wanted to become an
Confession Lutheran, following the Book of
Concord, which, AT THE TIME, I THOUGHT
was right ... I never believed Calvinism ...
but I learned many things from Calvinist-
Reformed/Presbyterian authors ... their
eschatology (amillennial/postmillennial)
helped move me out of dispensationalism,
which I had picked up as a Pentecostal and
popular Protestant ... after reading Hal
Lindsey, uncritically, I just believed
everything Lindsey said .... though I never
became a Baptist ... I just believed in pre-
tribulation rapture for a while, and read
the book by John F. Walvoord, The Rapture
Question, which changed my mind to
believe in the pre-tribulation teaching ... I
never learned ESCHATOLOGY from
Lutheranism, which is why I fell for
dispensationalism ... Lutheranism, TOO,
rejects the pre-tribulation rapture view,
along with Holy Orthodoxy, which has
NEVER believed in this pre-trib teaching....
anyway, my worst problem as Filioque ...
I was still attending Lutheran services, along
with my parents, but every time they said
(read) the Nicene Creed, I could never say
\"and the Son\", and so, there was an eerie
echo in the choir loft \"and the Son\", like a
ghostly voice, haunting me, though the
voice was human .... what I mean is, I felt
like I believed something that was no long
Lutheran ... I didn\'t fit in in the ELCA
Lutheran \"church\" anymore...
2. A second level of unity, for those who
are closer to Eastern Orthodoxy than the
Lutherans are.... the Oriental Orthodox...
Coptic, Armenian, Ethiopian, Syrian, Indian...
all these wonderful Christians are much
closer to the piety and doctrine of Eastern
Orthodoxy .... many or most of them follow
the miaphysite teaching of St. Cyril of
Alexandria, but, for historical reasons, they
didn\'t attend Chalcedon, and they seem,
some of them, to fear Nestorianism, and
have not understood, in some case,
apparently, that Chalcedon is not
Nestorian... however, all Eastern Orthodox
also count St. Cyril of Alexandria as an
important Orthodox Church saint ....
but I hope, eventually, this schism
(minsunderstanding) will be healed, or that,
perhaps, in some cases, it has already be
healed
3) finally, the third reconciliation ....
ALREADY ORTHODOX juridictions and
autocephalous churches, or Patriarchates,
all Patriarchates and Orthodox
jurisdictions, the 4 historical ones, plus
the 5th one, Moscow, and the other
Orthodox patriarchs: Romania, Bulgaria,
Serbia, or wherever there are
Patriarchs .... to be reconciled to all the
dependencies in the USA .... and all the
USA competing jurisdictions under on
diocese, Metropolitan, for the whole
USA ... and then, the most controversial
now (even more controversial than the
Patriarch of Moscow, ISTM), is the
Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople,
whom some Orthodox seem in lack of
communion with him, because of his
ecumenist activities with Pope John Paul II
and Pope Benedict XVI .... I think these
people who are troubled by this fact are
led by the Spirit of God.... therefore, we
pray (I pray), the Ecumenical Patriarch keep
from doing anything that offends the
sensitivies of the traditionalist Orthodox....
but I am no one to say whether he has
crossed a line that keeps the churches
here in the USA out of communion with his
churches .... He is still Orthodox, but the
Ecumenical Patriarch of Byzantium
(Constantinople) is a bit to soft on the
popes of Rome .... ISTM ..... perhaps,
however, he has commented to the pope
on the necessity for Rome\'s doctrinal
repentance ..... to again become a Roman
Orthodox Patriarch, rejecting Filioque, etc.
Anyway, this seems a long way off, but
perhaps the Orthodox churches will all get
together IF this becomes A UNITY in the
ORTHODOX TRUTH .... and errors from
heterodoxy are left behind....
and repudiation, leaving behind
membership, ecumenical activities with the
WCCC (The Georgian Church has taken a
strong stance against participation of the
Orthodox in the WCC)....
SO:
1. Non-Orthodox leaving heterodoxy and
becoming ORTHODOX
2. Oriental Orthodox leaving
Monophysitism, and reconciling whatever is
true in Cyrillian (St. Cyril of Alexandria\'s)
miaphysitism with full acceptance by them
of CHALCEDON and Chalcedonian
Orthodoxy ... and of course, rejection of
Monotheletism, and acceptance of
councils 4 (Chalcedon), 5, 6, and 7 (which
ever of these, if any), that they still need
to accept
3) PAN ORTHODOX UNITY historic
Patriarchates and all DIASPORA
ORTHODOXY UNITY WITH ALL PATRIARCHS,
WHO ABANDON ALL ECUMENISM AND
PARTICIPATION IN WCC .... NO UNION WITH
PAPAL ROME OR UNIATISM UNLESS ROME
AND UNIATES REPUDIATE ROMAN
CATHOLICISM AND BECOME ORTHODOX
CHRISTIANS...
TAKE CARE.
GOD SAVE US.
Scott
USA
Be the first person to like this.
Scotland1960 wrote:
Dear friends, It seems the unity we seek is
threefold:
1. Unity of repentance heterodox: coming
into Orthodoxy ... repentance is not an
easy road, but it is a road, not merely a one-
timed accomplished event ... we (I) need
Christ every step of leaving my errors (and
my sins) behind; it is not merely a matter of
leaving false doctrines behind, but moral
renewal ... and confession to God (and
priest when possible) after I have sinned
(serious sins) .... So, for example, ISTM,
LCA/ELCA, LCMS, other Lutherans coming
into Orthodoxy former AG (Assembly of
God) and (E)LCA Lutherans, like me ... my
road lead from LCA to ELCA to AG back to
ELCA and along the way, a few trips to
Presbyterian and Methodist churches,
though I never became a Methodist ... for a
while, I wanted to become a
Pentecostal ... I also wanted to become an
Confession Lutheran, following the Book of
Concord, which, AT THE TIME, I THOUGHT
was right ... I never believed Calvinism ...
but I learned many things from Calvinist-
Reformed/Presbyterian authors ... their
eschatology (amillennial/postmillennial)
helped move me out of dispensationalism,
which I had picked up as a Pentecostal and
popular Protestant ... after reading Hal
Lindsey, uncritically, I just believed
everything Lindsey said .... though I never
became a Baptist ... I just believed in pre-
tribulation rapture for a while, and read
the book by John F. Walvoord, The Rapture
Question, which changed my mind to
believe in the pre-tribulation teaching ... I
never learned ESCHATOLOGY from
Lutheranism, which is why I fell for
dispensationalism ... Lutheranism, TOO,
rejects the pre-tribulation rapture view,
along with Holy Orthodoxy, which has
NEVER believed in this pre-trib teaching....
anyway, my worst problem as Filioque ...
I was still attending Lutheran services, along
with my parents, but every time they said
(read) the Nicene Creed, I could never say
"and the Son", and so, there was an eerie
echo in the choir loft "and the Son", like a
ghostly voice, haunting me, though the
voice was human .... what I mean is, I felt
like I believed something that was no long
Lutheran ... I didn't fit in in the ELCA
Lutheran "church" anymore...
2. A second level of unity, for those who
are closer to Eastern Orthodoxy than the
Lutherans are.... the Oriental Orthodox...
Coptic, Armenian, Ethiopian, Syrian, Indian...
all these wonderful Christians are much
closer to the piety and doctrine of Eastern
Orthodoxy .... many or most of them follow
the miaphysite teaching of St. Cyril of
Alexandria, but, for historical reasons, they
didn't attend Chalcedon, and they seem,
some of them, to fear Nestorianism, and
have not understood, in some case,
apparently, that Chalcedon is not
Nestorian... however, all Eastern Orthodox
also count St. Cyril of Alexandria as an
important Orthodox Church saint ....
but I hope, eventually, this schism
(minsunderstanding) will be healed, or that,
perhaps, in some cases, it has already be
healed
3) finally, the third reconciliation ....
ALREADY ORTHODOX juridictions and
autocephalous churches, or Patriarchates,
all Patriarchates and Orthodox
jurisdictions, the 4 historical ones, plus
the 5th one, Moscow, and the other
Orthodox patriarchs: Romania, Bulgaria,
Serbia, or wherever there are
Patriarchs .... to be reconciled to all the
dependencies in the USA .... and all the
USA competing jurisdictions under on
diocese, Metropolitan, for the whole
USA ... and then, the most controversial
now (even more controversial than the
Patriarch of Moscow, ISTM), is the
Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople,
whom some Orthodox seem in lack of
communion with him, because of his
ecumenist activities with Pope John Paul II
and Pope Benedict XVI .... I think these
people who are troubled by this fact are
led by the Spirit of God.... therefore, we
pray (I pray), the Ecumenical Patriarch keep
from doing anything that offends the
sensitivies of the traditionalist Orthodox....
but I am no one to say whether he has
crossed a line that keeps the churches
here in the USA out of communion with his
churches .... He is still Orthodox, but the
Ecumenical Patriarch of Byzantium
(Constantinople) is a bit to soft on the
popes of Rome .... ISTM ..... perhaps,
however, he has commented to the pope
on the necessity for Rome's doctrinal
repentance ..... to again become a Roman
Orthodox Patriarch, rejecting Filioque, etc.
Anyway, this seems a long way off, but
perhaps the Orthodox churches will all get
together IF this becomes A UNITY in the
ORTHODOX TRUTH .... and errors from
heterodoxy are left behind....
and repudiation, leaving behind
membership, ecumenical activities with the
WCCC (The Georgian Church has taken a
strong stance against participation of the
Orthodox in the WCC)....
SO:
1. Non-Orthodox leaving heterodoxy and
becoming ORTHODOX
2. Oriental Orthodox leaving
Monophysitism, and reconciling whatever is
true in Cyrillian (St. Cyril of Alexandria's)
miaphysitism with full acceptance by them
of CHALCEDON and Chalcedonian
Orthodoxy ... and of course, rejection of
Monotheletism, and acceptance of
councils 4 (Chalcedon), 5, 6, and 7 (which
ever of these, if any), that they still need
to accept
3) PAN ORTHODOX UNITY historic
Patriarchates and all DIASPORA
ORTHODOXY UNITY WITH ALL PATRIARCHS,
WHO ABANDON ALL ECUMENISM AND
PARTICIPATION IN WCC .... NO UNION WITH
PAPAL ROME OR UNIATISM UNLESS ROME
AND UNIATES REPUDIATE ROMAN
CATHOLICISM AND BECOME ORTHODOX
CHRISTIANS...
TAKE CARE.
GOD SAVE US.
Scott
USA
God Bless You, Brother! :)
Be the first person to like this.