\\"Needless to say, you still haven\'t adressed the issue.\\"
It might help if you were at least a little more specific as to what this \\"issue\\" is. I\'ve been trying to figure that out, but so far all you\'ve managed to do is through the same laundry list of how I don\'t understand at me again and again. I\'d like to have dialogue, once you tell me what I\'m supposed to be having a dialogue about.
\\"You suggest that all of this \'outside\' perspective is an objective and justified view of Christians?\\"
I did no such thing! Not once did I bring up Marxism or the Nazis. I did not say that Christian persecution was justified. What you\'ve written is still far beside the point, that Christianity has blood on its hands and we should not sit in judgment of others. I was referring to the opinions of average people, not Soviets and Romans. Example: Muslims were subjected to more than a century of violent Crusades, their holy places burned, their people butchered. In that time, any Muslim in Christian lands, he was ridiculed and hated at best, and being killed was not uncommon. And the Jews had it worse. Is it any wonder they don\'t trust us often times? Even people who aren\'t of these groups realize that these things were wrong; they just let that blind them to who we really are. THAT’S my point, the point I\'ve been making from the start, the only point that needs to be made until you give me a clearer idea of what I\'m supposed to be talking about. I\'m starting to get tired of repeating myself.
Be the first person to like this.